Philadelphia Child Custody Lawyer

When it comes to child custody in Philadelphia, it is important to understand that custody can be categorized into three main types:

  • Legal Custody:
    This refers to the right to make significant decisions about a child’s welfare—such as education, health care, and religious upbringing. Often, legal custody is shared between the parents even after a divorce.
  • Physical Custody:
    This involves the day-to-day care of the child, meaning the parent with physical custody is responsible for the child’s daily needs and supervision.
  • Shared Custody:
    Custody arrangements can be divided into sole custody (full custody) or joint custody, which may involve either legal, physical, or both types of custody. In many cases, parents share legal custody.

Jurisdiction for Child Custody

Philadelphia follows the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act to avoid conflicts between states regarding custody and visitation issues. The key points include:

  • Determining the Home State:
    The child’s home state is generally the place where the child has lived for at least six months before the custody proceedings begin. If no state meets this criterion, the state where the child lived during the prior six months (provided one parent still resides there) may have jurisdiction. If these conditions are not met, a state with which the child and at least one parent have a significant connection—and where substantial relevant evidence is available—may assume jurisdiction.
  • Exclusive Continuing Jurisdiction:
    The court that issues the initial custody order retains exclusive jurisdiction unless the parties or the child lose their significant connection to that state.
  • Declining Jurisdiction:
    Even if a court has proper jurisdiction, it might decide not to exercise that power if it deems itself an inconvenient forum. Factors influencing this decision include the presence of domestic violence, the child’s duration of residence outside Philadelphia, distance between courts, financial circumstances of the parties, any agreement regarding jurisdiction, the location of key evidence (including the child’s testimony), each court’s ability to act swiftly, and familiarity with the case. Additionally, a court may refrain from taking jurisdiction in situations of “unjustifiable conduct” such as the wrongful removal of a child from another state.
  • Temporary Emergency Jurisdiction:
    In urgent situations where a child faces actual or threatened abuse, a court may assume temporary emergency jurisdiction to provide immediate protection.

Enforcement of Custody Orders

  • Interstate Enforcement:
    Custody orders from another state can be enforced in Philadelphia by registering the order with the appropriate court—accompanied by two copies of the order. This process enables the Philadelphia court to offer any available relief to enforce the order.
  • Expedited Enforcement:
    In cases that require rapid action, a court may hold a hearing on the first judicial day after the order is served. Immediate physical possession of the child will be granted unless certain conditions (such as improper registration, lack of jurisdiction, a stayed or vacated order, or insufficient notice to the respondent) apply.

Best Interest of the Child Standard

The guiding principle in custody decisions is the best interest of the child. This standard assumes that parents are generally best suited to care for their children unless proven otherwise. Key considerations include:

  • Primary Caregiver Role:
    Courts often look at who has been the primary caretaker, particularly following a separation. Philadelphia courts focus on the quality and quantity of time each parent currently spends with the child, rather than past arrangements.
  • Factors Considered:
    When determining custody, courts may evaluate:
    1. Which parent is more likely to promote ongoing, frequent contact between the child and the other parent.
    2. Any current or previous abuse by a parent or someone in their household.
    3. The extent of parental duties each party has performed for the child.
    4. The need for stability in the child’s life—encompassing education, family, and community ties.
    5. The availability of extended family support.
    6. The quality of the child’s relationships with siblings.
    7. The mature and well-reasoned preference of the child, if appropriate.
    8. Whether a parent has tried to alienate the child from the other parent (except in cases involving domestic violence where safety is a concern).
    9. Which parent is more capable of providing a loving, stable, and nurturing environment.
    10. Which parent is more attentive to the child’s daily physical, emotional, and developmental needs.
    11. The proximity of each parent’s residence.
    12. Each parent’s availability or ability to arrange for proper childcare.
    Additional factors include the level of conflict between the parties, any history of substance abuse, and the physical and mental health of the parents or household members. In every custody decision, factors impacting the child’s safety are given significant weight, and no party may receive preferential treatment based on gender. The court is required to document the reasons for its decision either on the record or in writing.

Federal Parental Kidnapping Prevention Act

This federal law requires states to recognize and enforce custody orders from other states if proper jurisdiction exists. The requirements under this Act closely resemble those of the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act. One key difference is that emergency jurisdiction under this federal law is considered continuing rather than temporary.

Additional Considerations

When awarding custody, factors such as race, religion, prior sexual conduct, or gender must not influence the decision.


About Divorce Lawyer R. Badet

Divorce Lawyer R. Badet is not only experienced in handling complex divorce cases but is also well-versed in child custody matters. Known as a trusted Child Custody Lawyer in Philadelphia and surrounding counties, his practice covers a wide range of family law issues including alimony, spousal support, child support, and custody disputes. With a commitment to achieving the best possible outcome for his clients, R. Badet offers personalized guidance through every step of the legal process. For more information about your legal rights and available options, visit www.lawyersfordivorces.net or call his office at 267-277-2641 for a free consultation. If you reside in Philadelphia County, Delaware County, Bucks County, or Montgomery County and need expert assistance, don’t hesitate to reach out.


Related Search Keywords

  • divorce lawyers nearby
  • divorce and family law attorney
  • low income divorce lawyers near me
  • international divorce lawyer near me
  • reasonable divorce lawyers
  • best rated divorce lawyers near me
  • finding a good divorce lawyer
  • find divorce attorney
  • divorce and family lawyer near me
  • divorce lawyers for men near me
  • black divorce lawyers near me
  • male divorce lawyers
  • black divorce lawyers
  • family law divorce lawyers
  • contested divorce lawyer

Additional Keywords:

  • best divorce lawyers
  • best divorce lawyers near me
  • child support attorney near me
  • cheap divorce lawyers near me
  • family court lawyers near me
  • best divorce attorney
  • family court attorney
  • custody lawyers near me
  • child custody lawyers near me
  • family law lawyers near me