Fault-Based Divorce Defenses in Pennsylvania

In Pennsylvania, fault-based divorces are when one spouse claims the other spouse is responsible for the breakdown of the marriage due to specific actions. The defendant spouse can raise several defenses to challenge the fault-based grounds. Below are the common fault-based defenses available in Pennsylvania:

1. Recrimination:

  • Definition: Recrimination is a defense where the defendant argues that the plaintiff is also guilty of the same wrongdoing. For example, if the plaintiff accuses the defendant of adultery, the defendant can raise recrimination if they can prove that the plaintiff also committed adultery.
  • Example: If one spouse claims the other cheated, the defendant may argue, “You did it too!”

2. Connivance:

  • Definition: Connivance is a defense to adultery. It arises if the plaintiff knowingly consented to or even facilitated the adultery. In other words, the plaintiff helped or allowed the spouse’s misconduct.
  • Example: A husband who encourages his wife’s affair, or even hires someone for her, cannot later claim adultery as grounds for divorce.

3. Condonation:

  • Definition: Condonation is a defense where the defendant asserts that the plaintiff forgave the wrongdoing, such as adultery, by continuing to live with the spouse after learning about the misconduct. This forgiveness can be implied if the couple resumes marital relations.
  • Example: If the spouse who was cheated on learns of the affair but continues living with the offending spouse, this may imply forgiveness.

4. Collusion:

  • Definition: Collusion is a defense where both spouses conspire to create false grounds for the divorce. This typically involves fabricating an accusation of misconduct to expedite the divorce process.
  • Example: Both spouses agree to falsely claim adultery to simplify or speed up their divorce.

5. Provocation:

  • Definition: Provocation is a defense where the defendant argues that the plaintiff’s actions provoked the defendant into committing the alleged misconduct (such as adultery). In other words, the defendant claims that their actions were a response to the plaintiff’s behavior.
  • Example: If one spouse is constantly verbally abusive or neglectful, the defendant could argue that this behavior led them to engage in misconduct.

6. Insanity:

  • Definition: Insanity is a defense where the defendant claims that they were mentally incapable of understanding the wrongfulness of their conduct due to mental illness. This defense applies when a spouse is unable to control their actions due to a mental condition.
  • Example: A defendant spouse may argue they didn’t know their actions were wrong because they suffered from a mental disorder.

7. Consent:

  • Definition: Consent is a defense to desertion or adultery. It applies if the plaintiff agreed to the defendant’s behavior, such as leaving the home (desertion) or committing adultery. If the plaintiff allows the spouse to engage in a specific behavior, they cannot later claim it as grounds for divorce.
  • Example: If one spouse moves away for work, and the other agrees to the move, then the moving spouse can use consent as a defense to desertion.

8. Justification:

  • Definition: Justification is a defense to desertion. The defendant claims they had a legitimate reason for leaving the marital home, such as being driven away by the other spouse’s wrongful conduct.
  • Example: If one spouse is being abusive, the other may leave the marital home and use justification as a defense to desertion.

Conclusion:

These defenses provide spouses with an opportunity to challenge a fault-based divorce in Pennsylvania, particularly when they believe the claims against them are not accurate or fair. In any divorce situation, especially those involving fault, it is crucial to consult with an experienced divorce lawyer to understand the best strategies and defenses to use in your specific case.


Contact Divorce Lawyer R. Badet:

If you need assistance with a fault-based divorce in Pennsylvania, Attorney R. Badet is here to help. With years of experience in handling complex divorce cases, he is committed to advocating for your rights and providing guidance at every stage of the process.

Free Consultation: Visit www.lawyersfordivorces.net or call 267-277-2641 for personalized legal support. Whether you’re facing a contested divorce, child custody, or complex support issues, Attorney R. Badet can offer the expertise you need.

Keywords for Finding Divorce Lawyers:

  • Divorce lawyers nearby
  • Best rated divorce lawyers near me
  • Affordable divorce attorney
  • Child custody lawyer near me
  • Family law divorce lawyer
  • Local divorce attorneys
  • Best divorce lawyers for men