In Pennsylvania, when one spouse files for a fault-based divorce, the other spouse may assert certain defenses to challenge the grounds for divorce. The available defenses to fault-based grounds for divorce include the following:
1. Recrimination:
This defense is used in cases of adultery. It can be asserted if the plaintiff (the spouse filing for divorce) is also guilty of committing adultery. The defendant would argue that since both parties are at fault, the divorce should not be granted on the grounds of the plaintiff’s adultery.
2. Connivance:
Connivance is another defense to adultery. This applies if the plaintiff either consented to or actively participated in the spouse’s adulterous actions. For example, if one spouse secretly encouraged or allowed the other to engage in an affair, that could be a defense to a claim of adultery.
3. Condonation:
Condonation is a defense that can be used in cases of adultery. It involves the plaintiff forgiving the defendant for committing adultery and continuing the marital relationship after the act. If the plaintiff had sexual relations with the defendant after learning of the adultery, it can be seen as a form of forgiveness, which negates the claim for a fault-based divorce.
4. Collusion:
Collusion is a defense where both spouses conspire to fabricate the grounds for a fault-based divorce. This means the parties agree to falsely claim adultery, cruelty, or other grounds in order to obtain a divorce. If the court finds evidence of collusion, it will likely dismiss the divorce petition.
5. Provocation:
Provocation is a defense to fault-based grounds like adultery or cruelty. The defendant may argue that the plaintiff’s conduct provoked them into committing the fault. For example, if one spouse’s actions led the other to cheat or act cruelly, provocation could be a valid defense.
6. Insanity:
In cases of fault-based divorce, if one spouse lacked the mental capacity to understand the wrongfulness of their actions, they may raise the defense of insanity. This is relevant if the defendant’s actions (such as adultery or cruelty) were driven by a mental illness or condition that impaired their judgment.
7. Consent:
This defense is used in cases of desertion or adultery. If the plaintiff consented to the desertion or the spouse’s extramarital affair, the defendant can use consent as a defense. For example, if one spouse moved out of the marital home and the other spouse agreed to it, the claim of desertion would be invalid.
8. Justification:
Justification is a defense to a claim of desertion. If the defendant left the marital home due to the plaintiff’s misconduct (e.g., abuse, neglect, or adultery), they can use justification as a defense. The defendant would argue that their departure was a reasonable response to the plaintiff’s wrongful behavior.
Divorce Lawyer R. Badet:
If you’re dealing with a fault-based divorce and need assistance navigating the complexities of defenses, R. Badet is a highly experienced divorce lawyer who can help protect your rights and ensure that you receive a fair outcome. His practice includes both simple and complex divorce cases, and he is dedicated to supporting his clients at every stage of the divorce process, including fault-based divorce matters. For more information or to schedule a free consultation, visit www.lawyersfordivorces.net or call 267-277-2641.
Keywords for search:
- “divorce lawyers nearby”
- “divorce and family law attorney”
- “low income divorce lawyers near me”
- “best rated divorce lawyers near me”
- “contested divorce lawyer”
- “family law divorce lawyers”
- “best divorce attorney”
- “affordable divorce attorney”
- “local divorce lawyers”