In Pennsylvania, fault-based divorce allows a spouse to seek divorce on specific grounds, such as adultery, desertion, cruelty, or other misconduct. However, the defendant (the spouse being accused) may assert various defenses to challenge these claims. The available defenses include:
1. Recrimination:
- What it is: Recrimination is a defense against adultery, where the defendant argues that the plaintiff (the spouse seeking the divorce) also committed adultery.
- Example: If the plaintiff accuses the defendant of adultery, the defendant may claim, “You did the same thing,” thus challenging the plaintiff’s grounds for divorce.
2. Connivance:
- What it is: Connivance is a defense to adultery. It applies when the plaintiff knowingly consented to or participated in their spouse’s extramarital affair.
- Example: If the plaintiff had knowledge that their spouse was engaging in adultery but tacitly allowed it to happen (e.g., hired a prostitute for the spouse), the defendant could use connivance as a defense.
3. Condonation:
- What it is: Condonation is a defense to adultery, which asserts that the plaintiff forgave the adultery and continued cohabiting with the defendant.
- Example: If the plaintiff discovers the defendant’s adultery but later resumes sexual relations and continues to live together as a married couple, the court may infer that the plaintiff condoned the adultery.
4. Collusion:
- What it is: Collusion is a defense where both spouses conspire to fabricate or exaggerate the grounds for divorce.
- Example: If both spouses agree to falsely claim adultery or another fault-based ground for the purpose of obtaining a divorce, the defendant can argue that the divorce petition is based on collusion.
5. Provocation:
- What it is: Provocation is a defense against fault-based divorce. It asserts that the plaintiff’s actions provoked the defendant’s misconduct.
- Example: If the plaintiff’s behavior was so egregious that it caused the defendant to commit adultery or behave in a manner leading to divorce, the defendant may claim provocation.
6. Insanity:
- What it is: Insanity is a defense where the defendant asserts they were mentally incapable of understanding the wrongfulness of their actions.
- Example: If the defendant was suffering from a mental health condition that prevented them from understanding that their conduct (e.g., adultery or cruelty) was wrong, this can be used as a defense.
7. Consent:
- What it is: Consent is a defense to desertion or adultery. The defendant can claim that the plaintiff consented to the desertion or the spouse’s affair.
- Example: If the plaintiff agreed to the defendant moving to another state (desertion) or accepted the defendant’s affair without objection, the defendant can claim that consent was given, thereby preventing fault-based grounds for divorce.
8. Justification:
- What it is: Justification is a defense to desertion, which asserts that the defendant left the marital home due to the plaintiff’s conduct (e.g., cruelty or abuse).
- Example: If the defendant left because of the plaintiff’s abusive behavior, they can argue that their departure was justified.
Legal Representation with Divorce Lawyer R. Badet:
If you are facing a fault-based divorce in Pennsylvania, understanding and effectively utilizing these defenses is crucial. R. Badet, an experienced divorce lawyer in Philadelphia, specializes in fault-based divorces, child custody, and support. With his extensive knowledge and litigation experience, he can help you navigate the complexities of your case and protect your legal rights.
For a free consultation, visit www.lawyersfordivorces.net or call 267-277-2641 to learn more about your options. Divorce Lawyer R. Badet is committed to ensuring the best possible outcome for your case.
Common Search Terms:
- “divorce lawyers nearby”
- “fault-based divorce lawyer”
- “best divorce lawyer near me”
- “family law divorce attorney”
- “experienced divorce lawyer”
- “contested divorce lawyer”
- “child support attorney near me”
- “family court attorney”